Composing a Technical Paper Intro Whether experienced at writing papers or simply starting, it is always beneficial to have your memory refreshed on what makes up a successful technical paper. Second, the paper needs to be well written and follow the style guide of the chosen publication.
I. Paper Approval It is essential to understand the criteria for the type of publication, and to understand the audience for which the paper is planned. Two common places for technical papers in the EMC field are the IEEE EMC Transactions and the IEEE EMC Symposium. A 3rd option is the Practical Documents area in the IEEE EMC Society Newsletter. Here, papers are normally shorter and cover subjects of larger interest to readers. The focus of this article is on papers submitted to the IEEE Transactions on EMC and the IEEE International Seminar on EMC Proceedings publications.
IEEE EMC Transactions The IEEE Deals on EMC has very clear instructions, situated on the within back cover of the journal, on the requirements for a paper sent for publication. Essentially, work of archival (long-term) value is sought, including advances in the state of the art, both theoretical and speculative. There are two paper length choices; a complete length, 8 page Paper, and a Brief Paper Complete length papers are peer evaluated in detail and edited, and several evaluation durations are possible. Brief Papers are usually 4 pages in length and usually narrower in scope. These are either accepted as submitted without any considerable changes, or rejected.
IEEE EMC Seminar Paper submittals to the yearly IEEE International Symposium on EMC may be directed toward the Regular or Unique Sessions, and all documents have the exact same requirements: they should be substantial to EMC, have technical depth, be legible in clear English, and contain brand-new, unpublished work. If the paper is directed toward one of the Special Sessions at the Symposium, do not make the mistake of thinking it will be instantly accepted due to the fact that it was “welcomed”. Believe of it as an invitation to send a paper on an unique topic; a subject that will not always be duplicated the following year.
II. Key Parts of a Technical Paper.
The Writing Introduction Once the requirements for the paper have been examined and the work has actually been finished and researched for technical worth, the writing may start. Composing a technical paper, specifically for a worldwide audience, can be a daunting job. Not just can the English language be an issue, but numerous scientists and engineers never ever learned how to compose a formal technical paper. There are a few good guideline guides on line,  and , if a tutorial is required; however, the highlights of technical paper writing and a few notes on a lot of the typical mistakes are given up this post. A technical paper is not an English paper. It is also not a science lab report. The layout of an official technical paper normally consists of the following key elements: Abstract, Introduction, Work Done, Outcomes & Conversation, Conclusion, and Recommendations. The Abstract and Introduction are standard with their titles and material. The meat of the paper is included in the center sections, Work Done, Outcomes, and Discussion, and the labeling or titles for these areas differ depending upon the subject. The final two areas, Conclusion and Referrals, are likewise fairly basic with their entitling and material. In some cases an Acknowledgements section is placed between the Conclusions and Recommendations. Working drafts often start with the Work Done, Outcomes, and Conversation sections. The Introduction and Conclusion areas can be begun a bit later, to assist in binding the circulation of the paper together. Make sure that any goals and objectives stated in the Intro are dealt with in the Conclusions. Strangely enough, the Abstract should be written last. It is only after the introduction and conclusions have actually been composed that there will be clearness in how to phrase this special, quick summary of the paper.
Abstract The Abstract is the most crucial part of a technical paper, and possibly one of the most misinterpreted parts. Abstracts are typically extracted from each paper and published individually in an abstract listing, for readers to browse when deciding which papers they desire to check out in full or go to for the actual presentation of the paper. The most common mistake made is to treat the abstract as a short introduction to the paper.
Using acronyms need to just be done if utilized again within the abstract. Making a referral with a citation at the end of the paper is never enabled. If these standards are followed, then your abstract will become a best selling point for your paper.
The first paragraph is the place for those wordy, eye catching expressions offering the factors for and value of the work, and why someone would want to read the paper. One mistake that is frequently discovered in paper submittals is that little, if any, research was done by the authors to determine that the work is indeed new and initial. No matter how well composed the paper is, it will be rejected if it is not initial.
The Main Body This is the main part, or “meat” of the paper, and includes the work done, results, analysis, and discussion sections. The precise layout and area titles will differ depending upon the topic. A description of the work and techniques utilized, i.e. how the work was performed, should be given up the first section. A mistake often made is to note the equipment utilized, as if it were a lab report. If a description of any of the equipment used is necessary in understanding the work, then it is acceptable to describe that key devices. Next, the results ought to be offered and examined. The results area is sometimes separated from the conversation section, however generally they are integrated. Tables, charts, and diagrams need to be used to help picture and discuss the outcomes and analysis. Each table and figure needs a written description; do not presume the reader can comprehend it on their own. What might be apparent to the authors may not always be obvious to others. Frequent problems are discovered with tables and figures when they are shrunk down to fit in a two column format. Please, use the sizes and formatting as defined in  or  Utilizing anything various makes the paper harder to read and follow, and triggers it to look less than professional. If the information of the figure can not be seen when diminished down, then consider breaking it into multiple figures. Pay attention to any labels or wording in figures that get reduced; these should be 8 to 12 point type after reduction. It is important to make sure the curves in numerous curve plots are appreciable. Despite the fact that using color is now acceptable, solid fill colors are chosen as they contrast well both on screen and on a black-and-white hardcopy. Going over the outcomes is also crucial, but leave the conclusions for the Conclusion section. The objective here is to provide an analysis of your results and a description of any significant findings. This will realistically lead readers into the Conclusion section.
This is a location many authors get stuck. They have actually written up their work and described, analyzed, and discussed their results. What more can be stated without repeating whatever in the summarizing? This is the time for the author to relax and consider how their work connects to the big picture. The author needs to evaluate their original stated function, the results, and conversations. Possibly there is more that can be done to advance the work. With these ideas fresh on the mind, the conclusion can then be composed such that it is not just a “we did this, this, and that”, however rather a concise summarizing, or evaluation, followed by a short discussion on how your findings connect to the big picture. A discussion of any suggestions for further work is likewise a fine addition, if pertinent.
This is particularly important if funding has been gotten from an unique source for the work and research study that was performed. Co-workers who helped in the work however were not included in the final writing might also be listed here. Papers that only referral the author’s previous work or a couple of current papers attract the reviewer’s attention as being incomplete.
Made a substantial intellectual contribution to the theoretical development, system or speculative design, model advancement, and/or the analysis and analysis of information related to the work included in the manuscript, Added to drafting the short article or reviewing and/or revising it for intellectual material, and Approved the final variation of the manuscript, including references.” Anybody not satisfying each of the three conditions need to therefore be included in the Acknowledgement area.
Once the last draft of the paper is ended up, do not forget to leave time for the review, both technical and grammatical. Composing an effective paper is time consuming, however is worth the effort when it is finally released and others can read and reference your work in their own research. Know and follow the criteria for the particular publication to which you are submitting, and make sure that all the elements of an excellent technical paper are consisted of in the next one you compose.